IMAM HUSSAIN RADI ALLAHU ANHU V/S (YAZEED PALEED LANATI)

IMAM HUSSAIN RADI ALLAHU ANHU V/S (YAZEED PALEED LANATI)
IMAM HUSSAIN,
THE TRUE IMAM AND THE
TRUTH ABOUT THE HADITH OF
QUSTUNTUNIYA


By: Mufti Syed Ziauddin Naqshbandi
Naib Shaykh ul Fiqh Jamia Nizamia.
Founder/Director, Abul Hasanaat Islamic research Centre.

IMAM HUSSAIN, THE TRUE IMAM AND THE TRUTH ABOUT
THE HADITH OF CONSTANTINOPLE




Allah SWT has commanded us to love the Family of the Holy prophet (Sallallahualaihi wa sallam) i.e. through the Holy Quran – (Surah Shu'ra-23).It is mentioned in the Hadith, "You instruct your children in 3 things: love of theHoly Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam), love of His Ahle Bait and the recitationof the Holy Quran.


Allah SWT says- Surah Ahzaab
This verse of the Holy Quran establishes that the Ahle Bait are shielded from all
kinds of blemishes, whether they are intellectual blemishes or blemishes of belief.
The background of the revelation of this verse, Hadhrat Umme Salma (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with her) relates, "This verse was revealed when the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) was present in my house. After this verse was
revealed, the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) summoned Hadhrat Fatima
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with her), Hadhrat Ali (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him), Imam Hasan (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and
Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). Then the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: These are my Ahle Bait. Hadhrat Umme Salma
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with her) entreated: O Prophet of Allah
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam): Am I not from the Ahle Bait? He (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) said: Certainly, you are also from My Ahle Bait."




LOVE OF THE PROPHET'S AHLE BAIT AND HIS COMPANIONS
IS A SIGN OF THE AHLE SUNNAH



There is a Hadith in Jame Tirmidhi. It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat
Abdullah bin Abbas (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) that the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "Love Allah SWT as He grants you
bounties (ni'mah). Love Me to love Allah SWT and love my Ahle Bait to love Me."
The grace and benevolence of Allah SWT demand that we should love Him. To be
able to love Allah SWT, we should love the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) and to be able to love the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam), the
Ahle Bait of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) should be loved.
It is as if the love of the Ahle Bait of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
is a step towards the love of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).
Whoever desires proximity (closeness) with Allah SWT and wants to be summoned
unto His presence, the only way for this is to love the Prophet's Ahle Bait. This love
will grant proximity with the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and
through the proximity of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam), the person
will attain proximity of Allah.
There is a Tradition in Sunan Ibn Majah and Jame Tirmidhi.
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: "By Him, who holds My life in
His hands, Iman cannot even enter the heart of the person, who does not love you"
(Ahle Bait).
In the Hadith of Ibn Majah, the words are "Until he loves them for the sake of Allah
SWT and because of My relationship with them."



DEGREE OF LOVE

The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) gave the command to love them and
also described the degree of love.
Love makes a person blind and deaf i.e. the lover can neither see nor hear of any
defect in his/her beloved.
The zenith of love is that the lover cannot notice any defect in the beloved even
when it exists. These personalities whom Allah SWT and His Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam) have commanded us to love, they themselves have vouched for
their virtuousness and have negated the possibility of every blemish about them.
Even after this declaration by Allah SWT, if anyone attributes something
inappropriate towards then, then that person is not raising objections against Imam
Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), instead that person is raising
objections against the Holy Quran itself. Besides, that person is breaking the rules
of love and is moving out of its pale.
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has not only commanded us to love
His Ahle Bait, but has also given glad tidings of Jannah and intercession to those
who love his Ahle Bait. My intercession is for those privileged people of the
Ummah, who love My Ahle Bait.
There are 4 lucky people for whom I will intercede on the Day of Judgment.
1. One who respects My Ahle Bait
2. One who offers them what they need.
3. One who manages their affairs when they need it
4. One who loves them with his tongue and heart
There is a Hadith in Zujajatul Masabeeh on the authority of Musnad Ahmed.
Hadhrat Abuzar Ghifari says: "While I held the door of the Ka'aba, I heard the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) say: Behold! Verily, the example of My Ahle
Bait among you is like the ark of Prophet Nooh (Alaihis salam). Whoever boards it,
is saved and whoever stays back is destroyed."



LOVE OF THE AHLE BAIT AND THE SAHABAH IS A TRADITION
OF THE AHLE SUNNAH

The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has declared the Ahle Bait as the
ship of deliverance and safety and the Sahabah as the stars of guidance.
Translation: "My Sahabah are like the stars of guidance. Whomever you follow,
you will be guided."
Hadhrat Mulla Ali Qari (May Allah shower His Mercy upon him) writes in
Mirqaat Ul Mafateeh on the authority of Imam Fakhruddin Radhi (May Allah SWT
shower His Mercy on him).
Translation: By the grace and benevolence of Allah SWT, we, the Ahle Sunnah are
in the ship of the love of the Ahle Bait and are also being guided by the stars of
guidance i.e. the Sahabah of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam). We
hope that Allah SWT will save us from horrors of the Qiyamah and from the
tortures of Hell and will grant us high stations in heaven, which is eternal"



SERMON ON THE LOVE OF AHLE BAIT AFTER RETURNING FROM
THE HUJJATUL WADA'A

There is a Hadith in Sahih Muslim.
Translation: "It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Zaid bin Arqam (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that one day, the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam) gave a sermon at Ghadeer, which is between Makkah
Mukarramah and Madina Munawwarah.
He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) thanked Allah SWT, praised Him and gave a
sermon. He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) advised us and reminded us of the nest
world (aakhirah) and then said: "O People! Verily, I have come as a human being.
Soon, a messenger from My Lord will come to Me and I will accept his invitation. I
leave behind, with you, 2 great ni'mah of Allah SWT. One among them is the Book
of Allah SWT, in which there is "Hidayah" (Guidance) and "Noor" (Radiance).
You accept the Book of Allah SWT and hold on to it firmly. He (Sallallahu alaihi
wa sallam) exhorted us towards the Holy Quran. Then said: The second ni'mah is
My Ahle Bait; I remind you of Allah SWT about My Ahle Bait; I remind you of
Allah SWT about My Ahle Bait….."
"I remind you of Allah SWT about My Ahle Bait". The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam) said this because love of Ahle Bait is for the love of the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and love of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi
wa sallam) is for the love of Allah SWT. Hence love of Ahle Bait will take you to
Allah SWT, so fear Allah SWT about them in that no inappropriate word about
them slips out from your tongue.
Hadhrat Mulla Ali Qari (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) writes in the
interpretation of this Hadith: The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said, I
remind you of Allah SWT about My Ahle Bait" times. The wisdom behind it is that
the first time it meant His progeny and the second time, it meant the Ummahatul
Momineen (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them)."





HURTING THE SAHABAH IS HURTING THE PROPHET

The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has emphasized about the Ahle Bait
and the along with them Sahabah that Allah SWT should be feared about them, as
given in Jame’ Tirmidhi:
Translation: "It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abdullah bin Maghfal
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi
wa sallam) said: Fear Allah SWT about My Sahabah. Fear Allah SWT. Do not
make them the target of your condemnation after Me. Whoever loves them, loves
them out of love for Me. Whoever hates them, hates them out of his hate for Me.
Whoever hurts them, hurts Me and whoever hurts Me, hurts Allah SWT and
whoever hurts Allah SWT, He will hold him to account very soon. "
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has declared relation with the Ahle
Bait as a means of deliverance and as a means of safety from misguidance.
Whoever attaches himself with them, will never be misguided. Then please
consider, will those pure souls fall prey to chasing this material world?
Therefore on the occasion of the Hujjatul Wada'a, when the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) gave the whole world a message of peace, on the same
occasion, He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) also gave the order for attaching oneself
with the Holy Quran and the Ahle Bait. Following them is a means of eternal
blessings and is a strong guard against wrong beliefs and irreligiousness. There is a
Hadith in Sunan Baihaqi and in Jame’ Tirmidhi:
Translation: It has been reported on the authority of Hadhrat Jabir (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with him): "I saw the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) on
‘Arafat. He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) was on His she-camel, Qaswa and was
giving a sermon. I heard Him saying, "O people, I leave with you 2 great ni'mah.
Till you hold on to them, you will never be misguided. They are, the Book of Allah
and My Ahle Bait."
When according to the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam), the Ahle Bait
save people from misguidance. Whoever attaches oneself with them cannot be on
the wrong path, then is it correct to blame them with the love of this world (Hubb e
Duniya), is it correct to label their struggle as a political struggle? Even after Allah
SWT declares their purity- Surah AHzaab-33. When the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam) prayed for them thus: "O Allah! These are My Ahle Bait. You
remove from them and grant them absolute purity."




IMAM HUSSAIN'S (MAY ALLAH SWT BE WELL PLEASED WITH HIM)
TRUTHFULNESS

Some people hold the view that Imam Hussains's (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him) going to Karbala and his martyrdom is a political matter and is a battle
for the sake of gaining power.
And that after the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) commanded the
Ummah to support Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him).
Can anybody claim that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) gave the
command to help somebody to get a seat of power or to support somebody in
hankering after the material world?
There is a Hadith in Kanzul 'Ummal: "Verily, My son Hussain (May Allah SWT be
well pleased with him) will be martyred in an area in Iraq, so whoever among the
Ummah is present at that time, should stand up in support of him."
How could Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) desire the
temporary power of this world when the whole creation gets the wealth of Taqwa
(Fearing Allah) and piety from the doorstep of his house.
How could he desire this world, when the following Hadith of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) was before him.
Translation: "A whip's space of heaven is better than this world and everything in
it." Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) is the leader of all
the young men of the Jannah whose whip’s length of space is better than this
world.”





DISRESPECT OF THE AHLE BAIT LEADS TO MISGUIDANCE
AND DESTRUCTION OF FAITH

There is a Hadith in Imam Baihaqi's Shu'abul Iman. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam).
Translation: "There are 6 people, whom I curse and the prayer of every Prophet is
accepted. (Among them are the following)
1. The one who considers things declared Haraam by Allah SWT as Halal.
2. Who considers those things Halal about My Ahle Bait, which Allah SWT
has declared as Haraam i.e. who disrespects the Ahle Bait.
This shows that disrespect of the Ahle Bait leads to misguidance and destruction of
faith.
There is a Hadith in Jame Tirmidhi.
Translation: "The narrator of the Hadith says that, "When I went to meet Hadhrat
Umme Salma (May Allah SWT be well pleased with her), she was crying. I asked
her, "What is the reason for your crying?" Hadhrat Umme Salma (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with her) said: I saw a dream in which the Holy Prophet's
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) blessed face and hair were covered with dust. Upon
asking, He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: I was present at Hussain's martyrdom
in Karbala….."
The presence of the Holy Prophet's (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) in the Battle of
Karbala is a striking proof of Imam Hussain's truthfulness.




THE LOVER OF THE IMAMS, HASAN AND HUSSAIN, (MAY ALLAH
SWT BE WELL PLEASED WITH THEM) IS ALSO IN HEAVEN

The famous Muhaddith (Hadith-expert) Imam Tabarani has related in Mo'jam Ausat
on his own authority, using his own chain of transmission from Hadhrat Abdullah
bin Abbas (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and Imam Ali Muttaqi Hindi
has recorded this Hadith in Kanzul 'Ummal Vol 13, Pg no. 103/104 on the authority
of Ibn Asaker. The Hadith in Mo'jam Ausat of Imam Tabarani Hadith No. 6649 is
being mentioned here.
Translation: "It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abdullah bin Abbas
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi
wa sallam) offered the Salaat (namaaz) of 'Asr. When the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam) was in the 4th raka'at, Hasan and Hussain (May Allah SWT be
well pleased with them). So much so that they climbed on the blessed back of the
Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam). The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi
wa sallam) seated them in front of Him. Hadhrat Hasan (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) came forward. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
lifted him on His right shoulder and lifted Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) on His left shoulder. Then He said, "O people! Shall I tell you
who are they whose maternal grandfather and grandmother are better than the whole
world? Shall I tell you who are they whose paternal uncle and aunt are better than
everybody's paternal uncle and aunt? Shall I tell you who are they whose maternal
uncle and aunt are better than everybody's maternal uncle and aunt? Shall I tell you
who are they whose mother and father are better than everybody's mother and
father? Listen! They are Hasan and Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him). Their maternal grandfather is the Prophet of Allah (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam); their maternal grandmother is Hadhrat Khadija (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with her); their mother is Hadhrat Fatima (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with her); their father is Hadhrat Ali bin Abi Talib (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him); their paternal uncle is Ja'afar bin Abi Talib (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him); their paternal aunt is Hadhrat Umme Hani bint Abi Talib (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with her); their maternal uncle is Hadhrat Qasim, the
son of the Prophet of Allah (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam); their maternal aunts are
Zainab, Ruqaiya, Umme Kulthoom (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them).
Their maternal grandfather is in heaven; their father is in heaven, their maternal
grandmother is in heaven; their mother is in heaven; their paternal uncle is in
heaven; their maternal aunts are in heaven and their sister is in heaven and whoever
loves them will also be in heaven."




SUPERIORITY AND EXCELLENCE OF IMAM HUSSAIN (MAY
ALLAH SWT BE WELL PLEASED WITH HIM)
GLAD TIDINGS OF HIS BIRTH:

The paternal aunt of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) saw a dream and
reported it to the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam). The Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) gave a happy interpretation of the dream and gave glad
tidings of the birth of Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), as
given in Imam Baihaqi's Dalaail Un Nabuwwa.
Translation: Hadhrat Umme Fadhl bint Haris (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with her) narrates that she went to the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
and said: O Prophet of Allah (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)! This night I saw a
horrifying dream. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) asked her: What
dream did you see? She said: I saw as if a part of Your body has been cut and
placed in my lap. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: You saw a
good dream. If Allah SWT wills, Hadhrat Fatima (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with her) will bear a son and he will be places in your lap. It happened as the
Prophet had said. Hadhrat Fatima (May Allah SWT be well pleased with her) was
blessed with Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and he was
placed in my lap, as the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) had said.
Then one day, I went to the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and placed
Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) in His presence. Then
what did I see? That the Holy Prophet's (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) eyes were full
of tears. Upon seeing this, I entreated: O Prophet of Allah (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam), May my mother and father be sacrificed for Your sake, what is the reason
of Your crying? The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: Jibrail came
to Me and said that very soon, some people from My Ummah will martyr this son of
mine. I entreated: O Prophet, will they martyr this prince? The Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: Yes and Jibrail gave Me the red sand of that
place."
In the Hadith of Ummul Fadhl (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), there
are glad tidings of the birth of Imam Hussain and also the prophetic nature of the
Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) is revealed. By the grant of Allah SWT,
He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) knows what is inside the mothers' wombs. What
has been mentioned in the last verse of Surah Luqman – 340 is intrinsic knowledge
('ilm dhati), which is the attribute of Almighty Allah SWT alone. Therefore by the
grant of Allah SWT, the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) not only gave
glad tidings of birth, but also specified the gender and said" ………..a boy will be
born" and also said that he will be placed in the lap of Hadhrat Umme Fadhl (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with her).
When the Imams were born, the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) Himself
said the Adhaan in their ears, as has been reported.
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) performed the 'Aqeeqa for both of
them: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abdullah bin Abbas (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) slaughtered one goat each in the 'Aqeeqa of the Imams Hasan and Hussain
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with them).




THE HOLY PROPHET (SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WA SALLAM)
STOPPED THE KHUTBA FOR IMAMS, HASAN AND HUSSAIN
(MAY ALLAH SWT BE WELL PLEASED WITH THEM)

There is a Hadith in Jame Tirmidhi. Sunan Abu Dawood and Sunan Niasai:
Translation: Hadhrat Buraidah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) says
that he heard Hadhrat Buraidah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) saying:
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) was giving a sermon. When Imam
Hasan and Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) came babywalking
wearing red striped garments. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) came down from the pulpit and lifted Hasan and Hussain (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with them); then again stepped on to the pulpit and said: Allah SWT
has truly said that this world is a great test. I saw these kids walking ever so
carefully; I could not stop Myself, so much so that I stopped My Khutba and lifted
them."
This Hadith reveals the deep relationship of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) with Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). In
childhood, even their falling on the ground was not acceptable to the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) stopped the Khutba, stepped down
from the pulpit and lifted them. With this, the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) made this as clear as the day they (Imams Hasan and Imam Hussain)
themselves are the Deen, as the Khutba cannot be stopped for worldly purposes.
Then by describing their actions on the pulpit, He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
made it as clear as the day every action of theirs is also Deen.





THE TRUE FACE OF YAZID IN THE LIGHT OF THE HADITH AND THE
TRADITIONS

The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has described all the tribulations,
which will occur till the day of judgment. He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) had
warned the Ummah about Yazid as well. Many Hadith have been reported in this
connection. In some Hadith, Yazid has only been indicated and in some he has
been explicitly mentioned, that the first person in the Ummah to change the Sunnah
and to destroy the Deen will be a person from Bani Ummayyah called Yazid.
The Imams of the science of Hadith, Imam Abu Bakr bin Abi Shaiba (May Allah
SWT shower His Mercy on him) has written in his "Musannaf," Imam Abu Ya'ala
has written in his "Musnad," Imam Ahmed bin Hussain Baihaqi (May Allah SWT
shower His Mercy on him) has written in his "Dalaail e Nabuwwa," Imam Ibn
Hajar Asqalani (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) has written in his "Al
Matalib al A'aliya," Imam Shahabuddin Ahmed bin Hajar Haitami (May Allah SWT
shower His Mercy on him) in As- Sawaaiq Al Muhriqa, Imam Ibn Katheer (May
Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) in "Bidayah Wan Nihayah," and Imam
Jalaluddin Suyuti (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) in "Tarikh Al
Khulafa."
The great Muhaddith of the 3rd century Hijri, Imam Abu Ya'ala (May Allah SWT
shower His Mercy on him) has recorded a Hadith along with its chain of narration
in his Musnad Vol 2, Pg No. 71; It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat
Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: The affairs of Ummah will be maintained
with justice, till a person from Bani Ummayyah will first to cast a crack in the
religion. He will be called Yazid. All the narrators of this Hadith are honest and
reliable.
Abul Faia Ismail bin Umar, famous as Ibn Katheer has recorded this Hadith in
Bidayah Wan Nihayah, Vol 6, Pg no. 256.
The aforementioned Hadith has also been recorded by the great Muhaddith Imam
Shahabuddin Ahmed bin Hajar Haitami in As Sawaaiq Al Muhriqa, Pg no. 132. He
has recorded another Hadith in this regard in the same book on Pg No. 132.
Hadhrat Abu Darda (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) relates: I heard the
Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) say: The first person to change My
Sunnah will be a person from Bani Ummayyah who will be called Yazid."
Imam Ibn Katheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) has recorded the
same Hadith in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 6, Pg No. 256 on the authority of
Hadhrat Abuzar Ghifari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). In that
narration, the words, "who will be called Yazid," are not related. This Hadith is
also present in the following books:
Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba, Vol 8, Pg No. 341. Hadith no. 145
Dalaail Un Nabuwwah lil Baihaqi- Abwab Ghazwa Tabuk, Hadith No.2802
Matalib al A'aliyah, Kitabul Futooh, Hadith No.4584.




MY UMMAH WILL BE DESTROYED AT THE HANDS OF A FEW LADS
OF QURAISH

There is a Hadith in Sahib Bukhari, Vol 2, Kitab ul Fitan.
'Amr bin Yahya Sae'ed bin 'Amr bin Sae'ed narrates on the authority of his paternal
grandfather; that he said: I was sitting along with Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him) in Masjid Nabawi in Madina and Marwan was
along with us. Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)
said: I heard the truthful Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) say: My Ummah
will be destroyed at the hands of a few lads of the Quraish. Marwan said: Allah
curse such youngsters. Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him) said: I can say 'so and so, son of so and so and so and so, son of so and
so, if I want to. Hadhrat 'Amr bin Yahya says, I, along with my grandfather, went
to Bani Marwan when they were ruling over Syria and found that he was a young
lad and my grandfather said shortly they will also become one of them. We said
you understand this better.




ASK FOR ALLAH'S PROTECTION AGAINST THE RULE OF LADS

There is a Hadith in Musnad Imam Ahmed. (Hadith No: 3800)
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) relates that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu
alaihi wa sallam) said: Ask for Allah's protection, against the start of the decade of
70 and against the against the rule of lads."
The interpreter of Sahih Bukhari and the author of Fath Ul Bari, Hafidh Ahmed bin
Hajar Asqalani (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him), mentions another
Hadith on the authority of "Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba, and writes: The Hadith of
Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba says that Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) even while passing through markets, used to pray, 'O Allah SWT,
let me not reach 60 A.H. and the rule of lads.'"
Hafidh Ibn Hajar Asqalani (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) writes after
mentioning this Hadith: In this Hadith, it is indicated that the first youngster would
become a ruler in 60 A.H. Accordingly this is what happened.
Yazid bin Mua'awiyah occupied the seat in this year, stayed there till 64 A.H. and
died.
The interpreter of Sahih Bukhari, Imam Badruddin ''Aini Hanafi (May Allah SWT
shower His Mercy on him) specifies what is meant by "the first kid to rule" in
Umdat ul Qari/ Vol 16, Pg No. 333. he writes: "The first kid to rule was Yazid."
It is mentioned in the Hadith, which mention the tribulations close to the Qiyamah,
Translation: "Then those who invite towards misguidance will arrive." In the
interpretation of this Hadith, Hadhrat Shah Waliullah (May Allah SWT shower His
Mercy on him) writes in Hujjatullah il Baligha,. Vol 2, Pg No. 213; Mabhasthul
Fitan: In Syria, the one who invited towards misguidance is Yazid and in Iraq.
Mukhtar."
The Pride of the Hadith-masters, Abul Hasanaat Syed Abdullah Shah Naqshbandi
Mujaddidi Qadri (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) mentions the opinion
of Hadhrat Mazhar (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) on the authority of
Mirqaat: By lads, it is meant those who were after the first 4 rightly-guided Caliphs,
(Khulafa Rashidun), i.e. Yazid, Abdul Malik bin Marwan etc."
In a very short period of time, he (Yazid) spread extraordinary decay in the
Ummah. He destroyed Madina Munawwarah (from where the world was granted
peace); in Makkah Mukarramah, (which has been declared by Allah SWT as a city
of peace), he set up cannons and rained stones on the Ka'aba. He denied water to
the Ahle Bait for 3 days in the battle of Karbala. He insulted the Ahle Bait. He
persecuted the family of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) to no end.
He martyred the associates of the Ahle Bait and he martyred Imam Hussain (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him).




YAZID ORDERED THE MARTYRDOM OF IMAM HUSSAIN (MAY
ALLAH SWT BE WELL PLEASED WITH HIM)–A CONFESSION BY IBN
ZYAD

Ibn Zyad himself said that Yazid ordered him to martyr Imam Hussain (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him) on the threat of death. Imam Ibn Atheer (May
Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) records the confession of Ibn Zyad.
Translation: "Now, about my martyring Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him), the fact is that Yazid ordered me to do this. He threatened to kill me if I
didn't, so I martyred Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)."
According to Islamic Law, if any person murders anybody else, then as a
punishment, the murderer is killed. But Yazid neither killed Ibn Zyad, Shimar or
other officials nor dismissed them from their offices. Instead, he expressed his
happiness. Afterwards, out of fear that the situation might go out of control he
expressed some sorrow in a formal, political manner. In fact, this wretched man
used his stick to poke at the teeth of Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him), those teeth, which the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
kissed.
Imam Ibn Atheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) has written in Tarikh
Kamil, Imam Ibn Katheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) in Bidayah
wan Nihayah, Imam Tabari (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) in Tarikh
Tabari.
Translation: Abu Muhnaf relates on the authority of Abu Hamza Thimali, who
relates on the authority of Abdullah Yamani, who relates on the authority of Qasim,
who said: When the blessed head of Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) was placed before Yazid, he had a stick in his hands with which
he started poking at the teeth of Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him). Then he said: Verily, ours and his example is as said by Hisseen bin
Hamam Mari: Our swords smash the skulls of those who have strength and
domination over us; and of those who are really disobedient and oppressors."
Hadhrat Abu Bazrah Aslami (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) said:
Listen O Yazid! By Allah! Your stick is touching that spot, which I witnessed the
Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) used to kiss. Then he said: Beware, O
Yazid! On the day of judgment, Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him) will arrive with such grandeur that his intercessor will be the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and you will arrive in such a state that Ibn
Zyad will be yours."
In Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 8, Pg No. 215, at the end of the aforementioned
Hadith, it is mentioned,
Translation: At that time, Hadhrat Abu Bazrah Aslami (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) said: Remove your stick! By Allah! I have often seen the Holy
Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) place His mouth on the mouth of Imam
Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and kiss it.




WE FEARED THAT STONES WOULD FALL FROM THE SKY

Due to the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him), the people of Madina became strongly opposed to Yazid and pledged their
allegiance to Hadhrat Abdullah bin Hanzlah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him). Yazid sent an army to attack Madina, which attacked the people of Madina
and persecuted its citizens. On that occasion, Hadhrat Abdullah bin Hanzlah (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) spoke to the people of Makkah and described
the unislamic activities of Yazid. Hadhrat Muhammad bin Sa'ad (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with him) who is a Muhaddith as well as a historian, has written in
Tabaqaat e Kubra, Vol 5 Pg No. 66.
The people of Madina agreed to pledge their allegiance to Hadhrat Abdullah bin
Hanzlah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and gave him authority over
their affairs. He took the pledge from them to fight till their last breath. Then he
said: O my community! Fear Allah, who has got not equal. By Allah! We stood up
against Yazid, when we feared that stones would be rained on us from the sky. He
is such a person, who declares marriage with mothers, daughters and sisters as
permissible (Jayaz), who drinks wine and abandons Salaat. By Allah! If no one
from the people supported me, even then I will use my courage and bravery in this
matter for the sake of Allah SWT."





WE COME FROM SUCH A PERSON WHO HAS GOT NO DEEN

Imam Abu Ja'afar Muhammad bin Jarir Al Tabari (May Allah SWT shower His
Mercy on him), writes in Tarikh Tabari, Vol 1, Pg No. 403:
They (the delegation from the people of Madina, after returning from Yazid) said:
"We come from such a person, who has got no Deen. He drinks wine, plays
tambourines, songstresses dance before him, he plays with dogs and listens to
stories with thieves and rascals. O people! We make you a witness that we break
our pledge given to him. Then all the people of Madina broke their pledge. People
came to Hadhrat Abdullah bin Hanzlah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)
and pledged their allegiance to him.
Imam Ibn Atheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) writes in Tarikh
Kamil Vol 3, Pg no. 337,
The great Tabi'e Hadhrat Hasan Basri (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)
says about Yazid: He was a drunkard of the last degree, he wore silk and played
with tambourines."
He was so addicted to wine that he did not stop it even when he reached Madina
Munawwarah in Hajj and started drinking there as well.
It is written in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3 Pg No. 465

Translation: Yazid performed Hajj in the life of his father. When he reached
Madina Munawwarah, he started drinking wine."
Imam Ibn Katheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) writes in Bidayah
wan Nihayah, Vol 6, Pg No. 262:
Translation: The reason for the incident of Hira is that a delegation from Madina
went to Damascus to meet Yazid. When they returned, they related Yazid's habit of
drinking and his other bad habit to their families. The worst among his habit was
that he missed Salaat because of wine. For this reason, the people of Madina agreed
to break their pledge of allegiance. They declared this near the Prophet's Pulpit in
Masjid Nabawi. When Yazid came to know this, he sent an army to Madina
Munawwarah. The leader of the army was a person named Muslim bin 'Uqba. The
Pious Elders (Salaf Saliheen) have also addressed this person as Musrif bin 'Uqba.
When he entered Madina, he declared the lives of the Madinians and their property
as "Mubah" for 3 days, which meant that for 3 days, the army could do whatever
they liked with the lives and the property of the people of Madina. Thus, in those 3
days, he martyred hundreds of people.
There is Tradition in Imam Baihaqi's Dalaail Un Nabuwwa
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Mugheera (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him) that Musrif bin 'Uqba looted Madina for 3 days and
raped 1000, unwed, chaste daughters of Islam.

It is written in Tabaqat Al kubra, Vol 5, Pg No.66: Muslim bin 'Uqba attacked
Madina with his army. Yazid's army martyred 700 Hafidh of the Holy Quran, raped
1000 unwed, chaste Muslim women and for 3 days, there could not be any Adhaan
and Salaat in Masjid Nabawi.




ALLAH'S CURSE IS ON THE ONE, WHO FRIGHTENS THE PEOPLE OF
MADINA

Yazid ordered the ravaging of Madina Munawwarah, public killings, when there are
severe warnings in Hadith for those just who frighten the people of Madina
Munawwarah. There is a Hadith in Musnad Ahmed, Musnad madaniyyen Hadith
No. 15962.
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Saib bin Khalad (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) said: Whoever frightens the people of Madina by their oppression, Allah
SWT will frighten him and on him rests the curse of Allah SWT, of the angels and
of all the people. Allah SWT will not accept any obligatory (Fardh) of optional
(nafl) act from such a person the Day of Judgment.
It can be imagined what will be the lot of the person who not only frightened the
people of Madina but spilled blood and ravaged Madina and gave permission to the
whole army for their animalistic deeds.

YAZID'S ARMY STONED THE KA'ABA

Afterwards, Yazid ordered the army to attack the Ka'aba in Makkah. Accordingly,
Yazid's army set up their cannons and stoned the Ka'aba, because of which the
curtain of the Ka'aba caught fire.
It is written in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg. No. 464,
"To the extent that when 3 days of Rabe'e ul Awwal passed, they stoned the Ka'aba
with their cannons, burnt it and started singing thus: "We have tremendous power
and courage, we stone this Masjid with cannons."
In the basic tract of beliefs (Aqaaid), which is taught in most Madrasas, Sharh
Aqaaid Nasafi, Imam Sa'aduddin Taftazani (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on
him) writes: Some Imams, because of ordering the martyrdom of Imam Hussain,
declare him as a disbeliever (kafir) and defector (murtad), and hold cursing Yazid as
permissible. The scholars of this Ummah are in agreement on the permissibility of
cursing those martyred Imam Hussain and those who ordered it or those consider it
(the martyrdom) as permissible and those who became happy on it. The fact is that
Yazid's agreement on the martyrdom of Imam Hussain, his being happy with it and
his insulting the Ahle Bait is well established by those traditions, which are in
effect, equal to the "mutawatir" (popular) Traditions, even though its details may
not be established by a first-hand report (Khabr Wahid). So we cannot exercise
restraint on Yazid, but we will exercise restraint about the Iman of Yazid. May
Allah curse him and his helpers."

SHARIAH RULING ON ADDRESSING YAZID WITH
"RAZIALLAHU ANU"

The words "raziallahu anhu" are used to signify Allah's pleasure. They are used as
a form of respect to praise somebody. "Raziallahu anhu" is used specially for the
Sahabah and for those pure souls, whose hearts are filled with fear and awe of Allah
SWT, as Allah SWT himself says: Surah Bayyinah-08.
The aforementioned Hadith and the interpretations of the Imams make it clear that
Yazid was wretched. He changed the Sunnah, he cast a crack in the Deen. He
insulted the Haramain, he insulted the Ahle Bait. Using "raziallahu anhu" for such a
person is to respect him and this is equal to destroying the edifice of Islam. This is
to invite Allah's anger and misguidance. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) has declared respecting an innovator (bida'ati) as helping to destroy the
edifice of Islam.
There is a Hadith in Imam Tabarani's Mo'jam ausat (Hadith No: 6263).
It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Aisha Siddiqua (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with her) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said:
"Whoever respects an innovator, verily he helps in destroying Islam."
There is a Hadith in Imam Baihaqi's Shu'abul Iman:
It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Anas (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: When a
innovator (bid’ati) is respected, Allah SWT expresses His anger and because of it,
the 'Arsh trembles."

PUNISHMENT FOR THE ONE WHO ADDRESSES YAZID AS
"RAZIALLAHU ANHU"

The just Caliph of Bani Ummayyah, Hadhrat Umar bin Abdul 'Aziz (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him) declared the person who addressed Yazid as
"Raziallahu anhu" as liable to be punished.
This is written in "Tahdheeb ul Tahdheeb", the authoritative book on Rijal (the
science of the classification of men, for the purpose of categorizing the Hadith), by
Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani, in Vol 11, the letter "ya", Pg No. 316. Imam Ibn Hajar
Haitamu has written in "As Sawaiiq Al Muhriqa" on Pg No. 132 and Imam
Jalaluddin Suyuti (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) in Tarikh ul Khulafa
Pg No. 166.
Nouful bin Abu Aqrab states that, I was in the presence of Hadhrat Umar bin
Abdul 'Aziz (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him), one person while talking
about Yazid said, "Amir Ul Momineen Yazid said so and so and Amir Ul
Momineen said so and so" Hadhrat Umar bin Abdul 'Aziz (May Allah SWT shower
His Mercy on him) said "You address Yazid as ‘Amir Ul Momineen’?" and ordered
that he should be lashed 20 times. Hence, he was lashed 20 times."
Imam Badruddin ''Aini (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) writes in the
interpretation of the Hadith "My Ummah will be destroyed at the hands of a few
lads of Quraish………".:Yazid was the first among those lads and wrote along with
Yazid's name: "On him is what he deserves."
DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE HADITH OF THE CITY OF
CAESAR
It is said about Yazid that because he participated in first siege of the city of Caesar
i.e. Constantinople (Urdu–Qustuntuniya), he is worthy of being forgiven and he
has already been forgiven. To prove this, a Hadith from Sahih Bukhari is quoted.





IN THE FOLLOWING LINES, A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THIS
HADITH IS BEING PENNED

There is a Hadith in Sahih Bukhari, Vol 1, Pg No. 409, 410 (Hadith No. 2924)
It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Umme Haraam (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with her) that she heard the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) say: The army from My Ummah, who will first perform jihad through the
water (sea), has made Jannah obligatory for itself. Hadhrat Umme Haraam (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with her) entreated, "O Prophet of Allah SWT, Am I
among them? He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: Yes. Then the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: The army from My Ummah, who will first attack
the city of Caesar is forgiven. I entreated: Am I among them, O Prophet of Allah
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)? He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: No."
If the collections of Hadith, the books of Rijal and the canons of history are
honestly gone through, then the falsity of the aforementioned deduction (including
Yazid in this Hadith) will be understood easily. Using the above Hadith to include
Yazid among those who have been forgiven is incorrect for many reasons.




FIRST INTERPRETATION OF THIS HADITH - to do

In regard to this Hadith, the Hadith-Masters have given a opinion that the "city of
Caesar" mentioned in the Hadith is not Constantinople, but Hims, which was the
capital of Roman Empire in the days of the Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).
It is given in Fath ul Bari in the interpretation of this Hadith.
Translation: "Some interpreters have said that the city of Caesar means the city
which was the capital of the Roman Empire in the blessed era of the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam). That city is Hims. At that time, it was the capital of
the Roman Empire."
This interpretation is all the more significant, because in Sahih Bukhari and in all
other books, the word "Constantinople" is not used. Only "the city of Caesar" is
mentioned. Caesar was the Emperor of the Roman Empire. The city in which he
lived or was his capital will only be termed as "city of Caesar." According to the
wording of the Hadith, that city is Hims. In the caliphate of Hadhrat Umar Al Faruq
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), in A.H. 15, an army under the
command of Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him) attacked Hims. Muslims laid siege to Hims in harsh winter and the end
of winter, they conquered it. In this battle, Hadhrat Khalid bin Walid (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him), Hadhrat Bilal (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him), Hadhrat Miqdaad (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and many
other Sahabah participated.
Imam Ibn Atheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) has mentioned
among the incidents of A.H> 15, in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 2, Pg No. 339:
Translation: When Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) finished the campaign of Damascus, he took the route of Ba'albak
to Hims."
At that time Yazid was not even born let alone participating in the battle. Yazid
was born in A.H. 26 as Imam Ibn Atheer (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on
him) wrote in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76.
Translation: "Yazid bin Mu'awiyah was born in 26 A.H."
A possible objection against this Hadith might be that in the Hadith mentioned, first
the Jihad by sea is mentioned, in which Hadhrat Umme Haraam (May Allah SWT
be well pleased with her) is a participant, then the siege of the city of Caesar is
mentioned. If the city of Caesar is Hims, then it should have been mentioned first
but it is not so.
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) first mentioned the Jihad by sea
and then the siege of the city of Caesar. It should be remembered that the order of
incidents might be according to what is being said or might be according to the
order of occurrence. In this Hadith, it is according to what is said, not in the order
of occurrence.



SECOND INTERPRETATION OF THIS HADITH

Other interpreters have opined that "the city of Caesar" means Constantinople. Still
Yazid is not included in the ambit of the said Hadith as Muslims attacked
Constantinople a number of times and the glad tidings of forgiveness are only for
those who participated in the first siege.
Now, what is to be seen is that, when did Muslims attack Constantinople for the
first time and which is the first army?




FIRST ATTACK ON CONSTANTINOPLE

It is written in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 7, Pg No. 179 about the first army which
attacked Constantinople.
Translation: Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)
attacked Rome in A.H. 32 and fought battles after battles till he reached the city of
Constantinople :
It is given in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg No. 25.
This shows that Constantinople was first attacked by Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). There is no mention of Yazid
participating in this siege. According to Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76.
Yazid was born in 26 A.H., so in A.H. 32, he was a kid of 6 years.




SECOND ATTACK ON CONSTANTINOPLE

It is written in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 7, Pg No. 179 about the first army which
attacked Constantinople.
Translation: Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)
attacked Rome in A.H. 32 and fought battles after battles till he reached the city of
Constantinople :
It is given in Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg No. 25.
This shows that Constantinople was first attacked by Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). There is no mention of Yazid
participating in this siege. According to Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76.
Yazid was born in 26 A.H., so in A.H. 32, he was a kid of 6 years.




THIRD ATTACK ON CONSTANTINOPLE

The third attack on Constantinople was in 44 A.H. or 46 A.H. It is written in Tarikh
Kamil in the incidents of the year of 44 A.H.:
Translation: In 44 A.H. Muslims, with Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin
Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) entered Rome and spent winter
there only and Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him) fought through the sea." Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg no. 298
It is given in the same book in the incidents of 46 A.H.,
Translation: Hadhrat Malik bin Abdullah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him) remained in the kingdom of Rome and it has been said that Hadhrat Abdur
Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) and
returned to Hims the same year and passed away into the presence of Allah SWT."
The Commander of third army to attack to Constantinople was Hadhrat Abdur
Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them). This
attack has been mentioned not only in the books of history, but also in Sunan Abu
Dawood, which is a reliable book from the Sihah Sittah (the 6 most authentic and
reliable books of Hadith). It is given in Sunan Abu Dawood, Vol 1, Kitabul Jihad,
Pg No. 340 (Hadith No: 2151), "Muslims attacked Constantinople and in this
battle, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) was the commander.
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abu Imran (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him): We left Madina with the intention of
attacking Constantinople. The commander of the army was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman
bin Khalid bin walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). The Romans had
their backs to the ramparts. A person readied himself for attack. The people said:
La ilaha illallah, he is taking himself to death. Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) said: This verse has been revealed about us,
when Allah SWT helped the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and made
Islam dominant, then we said, 'Come let us remain with our property and wealth and
set them right,' then Allah SWT sent this command: And spend in the way of Allah
SWT and do not put yourself in mortal danger.” Surah Baqra- 195 and so to take
oneself to death is to remain with our property, busy oneself in setting them right
and abandon Jihad. Hadhrat Abu Imran says that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) used to perform Jihad for the sake of Allah
SWT, to the extent that he was buried in Constantinople."
According to the above mentioned details, the army, which attacked Constantinople
under Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) in 32 A.H. is
the first army and this is the army, which according to Sahih Bukhari, is forgiven.
It is made clear by the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, that the Commander of the
army, which attacked Constantinople was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin
Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them), who passed away in either 46
or 47 A.H, as given in Tarikh Kamil in the incidents of 46 A.H.
Sunan Abu Dawood is from among the Sihah Sittah (the six most authentic books
of Hadith). It is by all standards more preferable than the books of history. This
proves beyond doubt that under the leadership of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin
Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) Constantinople was
attacked before 46 or 47 A.H., as the canons of history and Rijal establish that
Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with them) passed away in 46 or 47 A.H.
In 32 A.H., in 43 A.H., in 44 A.H. or 46 A.H., Yazid did not participate in any of
these 3 sieges.





IN WHICH SIEGE DID YAZID PARTICIPATE?

To find out whether Yazid is included in the glad tidings of forgiveness given in the
Hadith, it should be found in which attack of Constantinople did Yazid participate
and in which year?
There are 4 opinions in this regard.
He participated in the battle of Rome in 49 A.H. and he reached Constantinople as
given in Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 8, Pg. No. 34,
Translation: In 49 A.H. Yazid bin Mu'awiyah attacked the kingdom of Rome and
reached Constantinople.
Yazid participated in the attack of 50 A.H., as given in Umdatul Qari, Vol 5, Pg No.
558,
Translation: Muslims reached Constantinople in this attack and laid siege to it and
Yazid was the commander on the behalf of his father."
Yazid participated in the attack of 52 A.H. Imam Badruddin 'Aini Hanafi (May
Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him) preferred this opinion and said that this
opinion is to be preferred that Yazid participated in the 52 A.H. attack of
Constantinople, as given in Umdatul Qari, Vol 10, Kitab ul Jihad, Pg No. 244.
Hadhrat Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) sent Yazid in 55
A.H. to attack Constantinople, as given in Al Isabaa fi marifati Sahabah.
Whichever opinion is preferred, it does not prove that Yazid participated in the first
siege of Constantinople, because Constantinople had been attacked multiple times
before it.
About the opinions of Yazid's participation, the first one according to chronological
order is 49 A.H, when before this in 32 A.H. Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) and after him in 43 A.H. Hadhrat Basar bin
Artaah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him), then in 44 or 46 A.H., Hadhrat
Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him),
had all attacked Constantinople. Neither the books of Hadith nor the books of Rijal
mention Yazid's participation in any of these attacks nor has any historian
mentioned it. Therefore saying that yazid participated under the Hadhrat Abdur
Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with them) and is
therefore forgiven is not supported by any of the books of Rijal or history. Instead
by reconciling the books of Rijal and history, we come to know that this is a
fabrication. Believing in this without any support from the canons of history is akin
to changing the history of Islam.




A DOUBT AND ITS ANSWER

There can be a question about the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood that Hadhrat Abu
Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) passed away in the battle
which had been fought under Yazid, as given in Sahih Bukhari, Vol 1, Pg No. 158,
Translation: Mahmood bin Rabe'e says that I described this to the people, in which
the Sahabi Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him)
was present on the occasion of this battle. He passed away in this battle and Yazid
bin Mu'awiyah was the commander of this army in Rome."
In the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid
(May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) is mentioned. It is also mentioned in
the same Hadith that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him) performed Jihad continuously to the extent that he passed away.
It may seem that Yazid was present in the army of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin
Khalid bin Walid, but this is incorrect because Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) did not pass away when he was under the
command of Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him). Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him) led the attack on Constantinople in 44 or 46 A.H. and he passed
away in 46 or 47 A.H. Constantinople has been attacked after that, in 49 A.H.
under the command of Hadhrat Sufyan bin 'Auf (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him) and in 52 under the command of Yazid bin Mu'awiyah.
Hadhrat Abu Ayyub (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) participated in
both the battles that took place after the passing away of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman
bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). In the attack of
52 A.H., he passed away and this is the army, which has been mentioned in Sahih
Bukhari.
According to the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid
bin Walid's (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) commanding the army and
his passing away in 46 or 47 A.H., Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah SWT be
well pleased with him) participation in the battles of 49 and 52 A.H. and his passing
away in 52 A.H. and Yazid's participation in this particular battle, all this prove that
Yazid did not participate in the battle that was fought under the command of
Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him). It has also been proved that the siege in which Yazid participated, was
not the first siege, but before this in 32, 43 and 46 A.H., Constantinople had been
attacked. When Yazid did not participate in the first siege of Constantinople, he is
not included in the forgiveness referred to in the Hadith, because the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) never said that all the armies which attack
Constantinople are forgiven, but He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said that only the
first army to attack Constantinople is forgiven.




YAZID DID NOT PARTICIPATE SINCERELY IN THE LATER
BATTLES

History proves that even in the later battles, Yazid did not participate sincerely.
Instead he participated only on the insistence of Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him, as given in Tarikh Kamil Vol 3, Pg No. 314,
under the incidents of 49 and 50 A.H.
Translation: Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him) sent a huge army to Rome in 50 A.H. Hadhrat Sufyan bin 'Auf (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him) was appointed as the commander of the army and
Yazid was ordered to go with the army. Yazid started making excuses, cited illness
and did not go. Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with
him) also did not go. In this journey, the Mujahideen faced hunger, thirst and a host
of other difficulties. When Yazid was told about this, he recited some couplets, in
which he said: I don't care about the fever, difficulties which the army faces at the
Firqodona (place name), at der murran, I am sitting on a high mattress and Umme
Kulthoom (Yazid's wife) is with me. When Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah came to
know of this, he said with an oath, that Yazid should be definitely sent to the
commander Hadhrat Sufyan bin 'Auf (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him),
so that he understands the difficulties of the Mujahideen. Umdatul Qari Vol 10,
Kitab Ul Jihad.
These details of Umdatul Qari and Tarikh Ul Kamil show the character of Yazid
that to save himself from jihad, he made excuses. When the Mujahideen faced
difficulties, fell ill, he expressed his happiness, which is in not allowed in the light
of the Shariah. The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has prohibited
against expressing happiness on the difficulties of Muslims. There is a Hadith in
Shu'abul Iman (Hadith No: 2507)
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Syeduna Waathila bin
Asqa'a (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said: You should not express happiness on the
difficulty of your brother, lest Allah SWT has mercy on him and embroils you in
that difficulty."
Yazid did not obey his father's command which is a major sin (Gunaah Kabira). He
feigned illness, even when he was healthy, which is lies and deception. Later, when
Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him) put him
under oath to go, he reluctantly joined the army. Can it be hoped that when he
joined the army reluctantly, he would be rewarded for Jihad, when the Holy Prophet
(Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) has said,
Translation: Verily, acts are rewarded according to the intentions."
Imam Badruddin 'Aini (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on him)
Translation: What excellence can be there for Yazid, when his state is so well
known."
Even if it is said that Yazid participated in Jihad with all his heart and is forgiven
according to the Hadith, then does it mean that all his later sins are also forgiven?
In the interpretation of the Hadith of the city of Caesar, the interpreters, Imam 'Aini,
Imam Ibn Hajar 'Asqalani, Imam Qustulani (May Allah SWT shower His Mercy on
them), all have written in the interpretation of this Hadith, that the forgiveness
mentioned in this Hadith is only when the person is worthy of being forgiven.
It is written in Umdatul Qari, Vol 10, Pg No. 244,
Translation: Even if Yazid did join the army, even then because of his later crimes,
he has been excluded from this glad tiding. For this reason, the 'Ulama (scholars) of
the Ummah agree that the words, "they are forgiven" implies that provided they are
worthy of being forgiven. If after participating in that battle, someone leaves Islam,
turns into a defector (Murtad) and then dies, then that person is not included in that
glad tiding. This shows that the Hadith of the Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
means that the person joining in the army will be forgiven, only when the eligibility
is found in that person.", Umdatul Qari, Vol 10, Pg No. 244.




A QUESTION FOR THE SUPPORTERS OF YAZID

Those people who support Yazid and claim that he participated in the siege of
Constantinople and is therefore forgiven, even when the facts have been brought out
can they bring forth any proof from the Quran or the Sunnah? Even if he had
participated, will all his later sins be forgiven and Allah SWT will not take him to
account for them?
There are other acts also for which forgiveness has being declared. There is a
Hadith in Sunan Ibn Majah, Bab Majaa fil Ghusl, Pg No. 105,
Translation: Whoever washes a dead body, enshrouds it, perfumes it, carries the
Janazah, offers its Salaat ul Janazah, and does not reveal if he sees anything in the
dead body, that person is as free of sins on that day as if his mother gave birth to
him on that day.
In the same way, there is a Hadith about Hajj: Syeduna Abu Hurairah (May Allah
SWT be well pleased with him) relates: I heard the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi
wa sallam) say: Whoever performs a Hajj, uttered no obscenities, did nothing bad,
he will return that day in such a state as if his mother has given birth to him.–Sahih
Bukhari, Vol 1, Pg No. 206
There is a Hadith in Sahih Muslim,
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (May
Allah SWT be well pleased with him) that the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) said: Whoever bears the responsibility of an orphan or makes someone
responsible for the orphan, I (i.e. the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam))
and that person will be like 2 fingers (i.e. so close), Imam Malik (May Allah SWT
shower His Mercy on him) gestured with the first and the middle finger.
There are many Hadith in which glad tidings of forgiveness have been given.
Does the forgiveness mentioned in the above Hadith and in other Hadith mean that
a person after performing the above acts can leave Fardh Salaat, drink wine, steal,
persecute somebody, hurt somebody, murder somebody, even then because of the
past virtuous acts, all his later sins will be forgiven? No, what it means is that
because of the virtuous acts, the earlier sins are forgiven and not the later sins.
Otherwise, it should be said that if any person performs a Hajj, washes a dead body,
or bears the responsibility of an orphan, that person can leave Salaat, drink wine,
steal, persecute somebody, hurt and murder somebody but these sins will not affect
him, only because that person has performed some virtuous acts. No sane person
will accept that. This is a castle in the air. If this is accepted as correct, then the
society cannot be kept free of oppression.





SUMMARY

The Hadith-Masters have interpreted the Hadith, "the first army from My Ummah
to attack Caesar is forgiven in many ways. One of them is that the city if Caesar
mentioned in the Hadith is not Constantinople, but Hims, which was the capital city
of the Roman Empire in the era of the Prophet, as given in Fath Ul Bari. This city
was conquered in the caliphate of Hadhrat Umar (May Allah SWT be well pleased
with him).
Even if it is accepted as Constantinople according to the opinion given by other
interpreters, Yazid is still not included in the forgiveness, as Yazid did not
participate in the first siege of Constantinople. The first siege of Constantinople
took place in 32 A.H. under Hadhrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah SWT be well
pleased with him). The second siege took place in 43 A.H. under the command of
Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). The third
siege took place in 44 or 46 A.H. under the command Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin
Khalid bin Walid (May Allah SWT be well pleased with him). Yazid did not
participate in any of these attacks. There are 4 opinions about Yazid's participation
in the attack on Constantinople–in 49, 50, 52 or 55 A.H. Even if any of them is
accepted as true, then Yazid cannot be said to have participated in the first siege as
the first siege took place in 32 A.H.. Therefore, Yazid is not included in the
forgiveness mentioned in the Hadith.
May Allah SWT implant the love of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa
sallam) in our hearts and bless it with the love of the Ahle Bait, the elders of our
Deen, the Auliya and the virtuous people (saliheen) and protect our faith from all
kinds of trial tribulations and make us follow the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of
the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).

Yazeed Lanati in view of greatest Mufasirs in Islam

by Najam Mirani on Friday, April 15, 2011 at 3:16pm
Yazid (May Allah give him what he deserves, and May Allah be pleased with his Father Ameer Mua'wiya - Radhi Allahu Anhu)
It has been noticed that some people in their indirect or even direct hatred for Ahlul Bayt (Family of Prophet - Peace be upon him) try to cover the acts of Yazid and in this process they try to paint him into a great personality. With the Grace of Allah we shall see how this traitor to Islam (i.e. Yazid) got Imam Hussain (Radhi Allahu Anhu) martyred and how he ransacked Madina al-Munawwara and committed heinous crimes therein

Firstly we would like to present this beautiful sahih hadith of Prophet (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) regarding people who “Ransack” our beloved sanctuary called Madina al Munawara.

Imam Ahmed narrates this report from Sa’ib bin Khalad (RA) that the Prophet of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: Whosoever spreads injustice and frightened the people of Madina, then Curse (Lanah) of Allah, his Angels and all the people is upon such a person. [Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal as narrated by Imam Ibn Kathir in Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah Vol 8 Page No. 274]
Quran states: Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger, Allah has cursed them in this World and in the Hereafter and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment (33:57)


What could be a bigger annoyance to the Prophet than getting his grandson brutally martyred and ransacking the place which he had declared as Harram (i.e. Sacred)

1. The heinous crimes of Yazid

Imam Ibn Kathir (rah) says in his magnificent work of Tarikh under events of 63 AH

فقال ابن الزبير يا هؤلاء قتل أصحابكم فانا لله وإنا إليه راجعون

وقد أخطأ يزيد خطأ فاحشا فى قوله لمسلم بن عقبة أن يبيح المدينة ثلاثة أيام وهذا خطأ كبير فاحش مع ما انضم إلى ذلك من قتل خلق من الصحابة وأبنائهم وقد تقدم أنه قتل الحسين وأصحابه على يدى عبيد الله بن زياد وقد وقع فى هذه الثلاثة أيام من المفاسد العظيمة فى المدينة النبوية مالا يحد ولا يوصف مما لا يعلمه إلا الله عز وجل وقد أراد بارسال مسلم بن عقبة توطيد سلطانه وملكه ودوام أيامه من غير منازع فعاقبه الله بنقيض قصده وحال بينه وبين ما يشتهيه فقصمه الله قاصم الجبابرة وأخذه أخذ عزيز مقتدر وكذلك أخذ ربك إذا أخذ القرى وهى ظالمة إن أخذه أليم شديد
Translation: Ibn Zubayr (Radhi Allaho Anho) said: O PEOPLE YOUR COMPANIONS HAVE BEEN KILLED – Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilaihi Rajiun

"Yazeed committed a mistake and that too a disgusting one by ordering Muslim bin Uqba to make Madina "mubah" for three days. This was his biggest and ugliest blunder. Many Sahaba and their children were slaughtered. As it has been mentioned before that Yazid made UbaydUllah Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (saw) Husayn and his companions, and in those three days huge heinous crimes happened in Madina about which nobody knows except Allah. Yazeed wanted to secure his governance by sending Muslim bin Uqbah but Allah did against his wishes and punished him. Verily Allah killed him likewise Allah made grip over the oppressing towns, no doubt His grip is painful and strict".[Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 283]


2. Even Ibn Ziyad got outraged by Yazid

Yazid’s crimes were so heinous that even his loyal UbaidUllah Ibn Ziyad (whom he had sent to murder Muslim bin Aqeel and later Imam Hussain ra too) said:

كان يزيد كتب إلى عبد الله بن زياد أن يسير إلى الزبير فيحاصره بمكة فأبى عليه وقال والله لا أجمعهما للفاسق أبدا أقتل ابن بنت رسول الله ص وأغزو البيت الحرام وقد كانت أمه مرجانة قالت له حين قتل الحسين ويحك ماذا صنعت وماذا ركبت وعنفته تعنيفا شديدا قالوا وقد بلغ يزيد أن ابن الزبير يقول فى خطبته يزيد القرود شارب الخمور تارك الصلوات منعكف على القينات
Translation: When Yazid wrote to Ibn Ziyad that he should go to Makkah and besiege Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) he refused to do so and said: By Allah I will not combine two things for a Fasiq (i.e. Yazid). I have already killed the son of Prophet (salallaho alaihi wasalam)’s daughter (on his order) and now (he asks me to) wage war on Bayt ul Harram? However when he martyred Imam Hussain (RA) his mother Marjana said to him: May you die! what have you done and what crime have you committed, she also scolded him severely. Yazid was informed that Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) used to say in his speeches that Yazid was a fraud, drunkard, one who abandons Salaat and one who stays with singing women. [Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 279]

Imam Ibn Kathir (rah) further narrates:

ثم أباح مسلم بن عقبة الذى يقول فيه السلف مسرف بن عقبة قبحه الله من شيخ سوء ما أجهله المدينة ثلاثة أيام كما أمره يزيد لا جزاه الله خيرا وقتل خيرا خلقا من أشرافها وقرائها وانتهب أموالا كثيرة منها ووقع شر وفساد عريض على ما ذكره غير واحد فكان ممن قتل بين يديه صبرا معقل بن سنان وقد كان صديقه قبل ذلك ولكن أسمعه فى يزيد كلاما غليظا فنقم عليه بسببه


Translation: And he Muslim bin Uqba who is known as As-Salf Musraf bin Uqba, May Allah not do well to this leader of evil and ignorance, he made Madina legal for 3 days on the order of Yazid. May Allah also not grant Jaza and khayr to him(i.e. Yazid), he got many righteous killed and also looted the amwaal in Madina in great numbers, this has been multiply narrated that he created a lot of Shar and Fasad. It is mentioned that Hadrat Muafl bin Sanan (RA) was tied infront (of Ibn Uqba) and then martyred, you were his friend before but later you used strong words against Yazid due to which he became angry at you. [Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 280]


3. Yazeed’s aggression against the leading Tabi’i called Sa'eed Ibn Musaib (rah)

قال المدائنى وجىء إلى مسلم بسعيد بن المسيب فقال له بايع فقال أبايع على سيرة أبى بكر وعمر فأمر بضرب عنقه فشهد رجل إنه مجنون فخلى سبيله
Translation: Al Mudaini (rah) said: Sa’eed Ibn Musaib (rah) was brought to Muslim (bin uqba), He asked him to give bayah. (Sa’eed ibn Musab) said: I will give bayah on seerah of Sayyidna Abu Bakr and Sayyidna Umar (RA). (Muslim) ordered to get him killed but a man said This person (i.e. Sa’eed ibn Musaib) is a mad man (in order to save him), at this he was left alone. [Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 281]

4. Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani (rah)

Imam Ibn Hajr (rah) made the whole title in his book al-Imta bil al-Arb'ain as "SENDING LANAH ON YAZID (لعن يزيد)"
وأما المحبة فيه والرفع من شأنه فلا تقع إلا من مبتدع فاسد الاعتقاد فإنه كان فيه من الصفات ما يقتضي سلب الإيمان عمن يحبه لأن الحب في الله والبغض في الله من الإيمان والله المستعان

Translation: Loving and glorifying him (Yazid) is not done “EXCEPT BY A HERETIC” who has void belief because he (Yazid) had such characteristics that his lover deserves to be faithless, because to love and hate just for the sake of God is a sign of faith. [Publisher's name: Dar ul Kutb al iLmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, Book name: al-Imta bil al-Arba'in al-Matbainatus Samah (الإمتاع بالأربعين المتباينة السماع), Author: Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah), Publication date: 1997, Page No. 96]

قال يحيـى بن عبد الملك بن أبـي غنية أحد الثقات، ثنا نوفل بن أبـي عقرب ثقة قال: كنت عند عمر بن عبد العزيز فذكر رجل يزيد بن معاوية، فقال: قال أمير المؤمنين يزيد، فقال عمر: تقول أمير المؤمنين يزيد، وأمر به فضرب عشرين سوطاً

Yahya bin Abdul Mulk bin Abi Ghania "WHO WAS AMONGST THIQA NARRATORS" he heard from Nawfl bin Abi Aqrab "WHO IS THIQA" he narrates: Once in the gathering of Umar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] people talked about Yazid bin Muawiya, someone among the people mentioned Yazid with the title of Ameer ul Momineen, hearing this Hadrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz [ra] replied (in anger): You have called Yazeed Amir Ul Mominein? Then he gave order of 20 lashes to be given to the person [Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani in Tahdhib ut Tahdhib, Volume No. 6, Page No. 313].


5. Imam Jalal ud din Suyuti (rah) in Tarikh ul Khulafa

He states: You (Imam Hussain - Radhi Allaho Anho) were martyred and your head was brought to Ibn Ziyad on a plate. "May Allah's Lanah (Curse) be upon the person who killed you, also Ibn Ziyad "AND UPON YAZID" [As-Suyuti in Tarikh ul Khulafa, Page No. 165]
Imam Jalal ud-din Suyuti (rah) writes: Nawfl bin Abi Firaat (rah) said that once he was sitting with Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz (rah) when a man called Yazid as "Ameer ul Momineen Yazid bin Muawiya" at this (Umar bin Abdul Aziz said in anger): you call this person as Ameer ul Momineen?! and then he ordered that person to be "lashed 20 times" in 63 AH Yazid got to know that people of Madina have rejected him and are preparing to wage war upon him, knowing this Yazid sent a huge army to Madina and "declared war upon people of Madina" after looting in Madina he sent the army to martyr Hadrat Abdullah bin Zubayr (ra) in Makkah and so the incident of "HURRA" took place, do you know what Hurra is? regarding it Hassan (a Tabi'i) said: When Madina was attacked, there remained not a single person who was safe from it, "huge amount of Sahaba and others were martyred and Madina was looted and thousands of virgin girls were raped" Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilaihi Rajiun... The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: Whosoever frightens People of Madina then Allah will frighten them (the attackers) plus Curse (Lanah) of Allah, his Angels and all the people is upon such a person (Sahih Muslim) the reason why people of Madina did not give bayah to Yazid was because he was indulged in “too many sins” Imam Waqidi (rah) narrates from Abdullah Bin Khazlatal Ghusail (a Sahabi) that he said: By Allah we did not revolt against Yazid until we were sure that “WE WILL BE SHOWERED WITH STONES FROM SKY” (the Yazidans) started to do Nikah with their mothers, sisters and daughters, they started to drink openly and neglected prayers! Imam Dhahabi (rah) said: When Yazid did such things with people of Madina although “ he was indulged in drinking and other evil deeds even before” then the people of Makkah also revolted against him and rose against him from 4 sides and then Allah did not put Barakah in life of Yazid (Then it mentions that Yazid attacked Makkah and got the Abdullah Ibn Zubayr Martyred)

Reference: As-Suyuti, Tarikh ul Khulafa, Page No. 167



6. Allama Aloosi (Rahimuhullah) writes under 47:22-23 in his magnificent Ruh ul Ma’ani

واستدل بها أيضاً على جواز لعن يزيد عليه من الله تعالى ما يستحق. نقل البرزنجي في «الإشاعة» والهيتمي في «الصواعق» أن الإمام أحمد لما سأله ولده عبد الله عن لعن يزيد قال كيف لا يلعن من لعنه الله تعالى في كتابه؟ فقال عبد الله قد قرأت كتاب الله عز وجل فلم أجد فيه لعن يزيد فقال الإمام إن الله تعالى يقول:
{ فَهَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِن تَوَلَّيْتُمْ أَن تُفْسِدُواْ فِي ٱلأَرْضِ وَتُقَطّعُواْ أَرْحَامَكُمْ * أَوْلَـئِكَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَعَنَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ }
[محمد: 22] الآية وأي فساد وقطيعة أشد مما فعله يزيد؟
Translation:The Proof of sending Lanah upon Yazid is derived from this (ayah), as was mentioned by Al-Barzanji (rah) in his Al-Ashaat and Imam al-Haythami (rah) in As-Sawaiq from Imam Ahmed (rah) that his son Abdullah asked him about sending Lanah on Yazid, (Imam Ahmed) said: Why cannot Lanah be sent on him when Allah has sent Lanah on him in Quran, Abdullah (rah) asked: Recite the Kitab of Allah so that I know how Lanah is sent on Yazid? Imam Ahmed (rah) mentioned these verses: Would ye then, if ye were given the command, work corruption in the land and sever your ties of kinship? Such are the men whom Allah has cursed…(47:22-23) Hence what could be a bigger Strife than what Yazid did?[ [Ruh ul Ma’ani by Imam Al-Alusi, Volume 9 Under Surah Muhammad 22-23]

2) Allama Alusi said: And I say what is prevalent over my mind that (Yazid) Khabith did not testify to the messengership of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). According to me it is correct to curse a person like Yazid, although one cannot imagine a Fasiq like him and apparently he never repented, the possibility of his repentance is weaker than the possibility of his faith (Iman). Along with Yazid, Ibn Ziyad, Ibn Sa'ad and his group shall also be included. Verily, may Allah's curse be upon all of them, their friends, their supporters, their group and upon everyone who inclines towards them until Qayamah and until an eye sheds a tear for Abu Abdullah Hussain (ra). [Tafsir Ruh al-Ma'ani, Volume 26, Page No. 73]


7. Imam Dhahabi (rah) writes about Yazid

وكان ناصبيا فظا غليظا جلفا يتناول المسكر ويفعل المنكر افتتح دولته بمقتل الشهيد الحسين واختتمها بواقعة الحرة فمقته الناس ولم يبارك في عمره وخرج عليه غير واحد بعد الحسين كأهل المدينة قاموا لله

Translation: He (Yazid) was a disgusting Nasibi (i.e. those who hate Ahlul bayt). He drank and did evil. He started his kingdom with the killing of the Shahid al-Hussain (RA) and ended it with the incident of al-Harra (i.e. besiegement of Madina which also makes him directly liable for Lanah as sahih ahadith prove). Hence the people hated him, he was not blessed in his life, and many took up arms against him after Imam Hussain (RA) such as the people of Madina - they rose for the sake of Allah[As Siyar al Alam an Nabula, Volume No. 4, Page No. 37-38]
2) Imam Dhahabi (rah) writes: I say: 'When Yazid did to the people of Madina what he did and killed al-Hussain and his brothers and progeny, and Yazid drank alcohol, and performed abominable things, then the people hated him and rose up against him more than once. God didn't bless his life and Abu Bilal Mirdas bin Adya al-Hanzali rose against him.' [Tarikh al-Islam: wa-tabaqat al-mashahir wa-al-a`lam, Volume 005, Page No. 30]

3) Imam Dhahabi Writes: Ziyad Haarthi narrated: 'Yazid gave me alcohol to drink, I had never drunk alcohol like that before and I enquired where he had obtained its ingredients from'. Yazid replied: 'it is made of sweet pomegranate, Isfahan's honey, Hawaz's sugar, Taif's grapes and Burdah's water'. Ahmed bin Masama' narrated: 'Once Yazid drank alcohol and started to dance, suddenly he fell down and his nostril began to bleed'. [Siyar al A'lam wa al Nubalah, Volume 004, Page No. 037]


8. Qadhi ThanaUllah Panipati (rah) on Yazid

Another great Mufasir and author of great books, a scholar accepted by all Sunni Muslims i.e. Qadhi Thana Ullah Panipatti (rah) quoted Quranic ayah 14:28 and writes:

Quran states: Hast thou not seen those who gave the grace of Allah in exchange for thanklessness and led their people down to the Abode of Loss (14:28)

Tafsir: Bani Ummaiya had always rejoiced upon Kufr, however Abu Sufyan, Ameer Mu’awiya (RA) and Umaro bin Aas(RA) and others became Muslims. Later Yazid and his companions rejected the blessings of Allah and rose the flag of enmity towards Ahlul Bayt and finally brutally martyred Imam Hussain (RA) to the extent that Yazid even denied the Deen of Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam). He after martyrdom of Imam Hussain(RA) said: Had my predecessors lived they would have seen how I took revenge from the family of Prophet (saw) and Bani Hashim, The couplet which Yazid made had this in the end: I will avenge Ahmed (i.e. Prophet Salallaho alaihi wasalam) for whatever he did with my predecessors in Badr (Naudhobillah). Yazid even declared alcohol as permissible and in praise of it he said: If liquor is Haram in the Deen of Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam) then take it to be permissible according to the deen of Isa Ibn Marym (a.s). [Tafsir al Mazhari Volume 5, Pages 211-212]


9. Ibn Kathir's comments on Yazeed

Ibn Kathir himself writes in al Bidayah Volume 8 page 1169 "Dhikr Yazeed bin Muawiyah":

"Traditions inform us that Yazeed loved worldly vices, would drink, listen to music, kept the company of boys with no facial hair [civil expression for paedophilia with boys, a form of homosexuality], played drums, kept dogs [civil expression for bestiality], making frogs, bears and monkeys fight. Every morning he used be intoxicated and use to bind monkey with the saddle of a horse and make the horse run".

Reference:Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 1169
10. Ibn Atheer's comments on Yazeed
In Tareekh al Kamil Volume 3 page 450 Ibn Atheer narrates from Munzir bin Zabeer:

"Verily Yazeed rewarded me with 100,000 dirhams but this cannot stop me from highlighting his state, By Allah he is a drunkard"

11. Ibn Jauzi's comments on Yazeed 'the drunkard'


Ibn Jauzi in Wafa al-Wafa:

"Yazeed appointed his cousin Uthman bin Muhammad bin Abu Sufyan as Governor of Madina. He sent a delegation to visit Yazeed who bore gifts so that they might take the oath of allegiance to him. Upon their return they said 'We have returned having visited a man who has no religion, he drinks, plays instruments, keeps the company of singers and dogs [civil word for bestiality], we declare that we have broken our allegiance to him. Abdullah bin Abi Umro bin Hafs Mukhzumee commented 'Yazeed gave me gifts. But the reality is this man is an enemy of Allah (swt) and a drunkard. I shall separate myself from him in the same way that I remove my turban [from my head]."


12. Punturing the devil's dream on Hadith of Qustuntunia


.."He heard the Prophet saying, 'Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition.' The Prophet then said, 'The first army amongst my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.'" (Sahih Bukhari volume 4 hadith 175)

Firstly Yazid was not in the first army to wage war on ceaser's city as

Sahih hadith in Sunnan Abu Dawud states

عن أسلم أبي عمران قال : غزونا من المدينة نريد القسطنطينية وعلى الجماعة عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن الوليد

Translation: Aslam Abi Imran (ra) said: We went out on an expedition from Madina with the intent to attack Constantinople. Abd al-Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid was the leader of our group. [Sunnan Abu Dawud, Volume No. 2 Hadith # 2512, Albani declared it Sahih in his Takhrij]

Imam At-Tabri says in his Tarikh

فمما كان فيها من ذلك دخول المسلمين مع عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن الوليد بلاد الروم ومشتاهم بها وغزو

Translation: In (44 AH) The Muslims with Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid entered Rome and the Ghazwa took place [Tarikh at-Tabri under events of 44 AH, Volume 005, Page No. 212: Published by Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif] Click here for
Whereas Yazid went way later i.e. in 49 or 50 AH. Even later yazid was sent as a punishement and he mocked at Muslims warriors who had gone before

Imam Ibn Al-Atheer (rah) writes:

في هذه السنة وقيل ‏:‏ سنة خمسين سير معاوية جيشًا كثيفًا إلى بلاد الروم للغزاة ، وجعل عليهم سفيان بن عوف ، وأَمَرَ ابنه يزيد بالغزاة معهم فتثاقل واعتلّ فأمسك عنه أبوه ، فأصاب الناس في غزاتهم جوعٌ ومرض شديد ، فأنشأ يزيد يقول ‏:‏

ما إن أبالي بما لاقت جموعهم *** بالفرقدونة من حمى ومن موم
إذا اتكأت على الأنماط مرتفقًا *** بدير مروان عندي أم كلثومِ

فبلغ معاوية شعره، فأقسم عليه ليلحقنّ بسفيان في أرض الروم، ليصيبه ما أصاب الناس، فسار ومعه جمع كثير أضافهم إليه أبوه
Translation: In this year i.e. 49 AH or 50 AH, Muawiya (ra) sent a huge army towards Rome. He made Sufyan bin Awf (ra) as its commander and he ordered his son Yazid to go with them, however Yazid “ACTED TO HAVE BECOME SICK AND DENIED TO GO” When the warriors were struck with harsh hunger and diseases, Yazid (mockingly) said this poetry:

At Farqudwana immense wrath covered them, whether they had fever or whatever I don’t care because I am sitting on a high carpet and Umm ul Kulthum (one of his wives) is between my armpits.

When Ameer Muawiya (ra) heard these phrases he made Yazid to take an oath and join Sufyan bin Awf in Rome so that “HE COULD ALSO BE STRUCK BY THESE SAME DIFFICULTIES AS THE WARRIORS OF ISLAM HAD FACED (THIS WAS PUNISHEMENT TO YAZID)” Yazid became helpless and he had to go and Ameer Muawiya (ra) sent another army with him [Tarikh Ibn al Atheer, Volume No.3, Page No. 131]

Imam Badr ud-din Ayni (rah) said:

قلت: الأظهر أن هؤلاء السادات من الصحابة كانوا مع سفيان هذا ولم يكونوا مع يزيد بن معاوية، لأنه لم يكن أهلاً أن يكون هؤلاء السادات في خدمته

Translation: I say that it is obvious that the great amount of sahaba went under the leadership of Sufyan bin Awf (ra) and “NOT WITH YAZID BIN MUAWIYA BECAUSE HE WAS NOT DESERVING OF LEADING THEM” [Umdat ul Qari, Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari 14/197-198]

Summary details about the armed expeditions:

► First attack on Caesar's city was in 42 hijri. Second attack was in 43 and "Hazrat Bosr ben ABI Arka was the leader of this army.

► Third attack was in 44 and this was led by Abdurehman ben Khalid ben Waleed. The next attack was in 46 hijri which was led by Maalik ben Abdurehman and Abdurehman ben Khalid ben Waleed.

► In 47, next attack was led by Maalik ben Hobaira and Abdurehman ben Qaiymi. In 49 hijri the rome was attacked for 3 times. andLastly yazid was in attack of 50 hijri.

Hazrat Amir Mawiya (RA) arrested Yazeed and sent him to ceasar because Yazeed was used to make fun of Mujahideen and as a punishment Yazeed was sent there not for Jihad

So Yazeed was in the seven'th attack, not in the first attack and in Bukhari Shareef it is mentioned that 'The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.'

References

Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah Imam Ibne Kathir
History Ibne Khaldon
History Imam Ibne Atheer


13. Yazeed's rejection of the Qur'an

Refer these sources

1. Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah Volume 8 page 204 Dhikr Ras al Husayn
2. Minhajj al Sunnah Volume 2 page 249 Dkikr Yazeed
3. Sharh Fiqh Akbar page 73 Dhikr Yazeed
4. Sharh Tafseer Mazhari Volume 5 page 21 Surah Ibrahim
5. Shazrah al Dhahab page 69 Dhikr Shahadth Husayn
6. Maqatahil Husayn Volume 2 page 58 Dhikr Shahdath Husayn
7. Tadhkira Khawwas page 148
8. Tareekh Tabari Volume 11 pages 21-23 Dhikr 284 Hijri
9. Tafseer Ruh al Ma'ani (commentary of Surah Muhammad)

14. In Tafseer Ruh al Maani Declairing Yazeed a kafir


"Allamah Alusi stated, Yazeed the impure denied the Prophethood of Rasulullah (s). The treatment that he meted out to the people of Makka, Medina and the family of the Prophet proves that he was a kaafir".


Once in the gathering of Amir Ul Mominein Hazrat Ummar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] people talked about yazeed, someone among the people said ( Amir Ul Mominein to Yazeed ) Hazrat Ummar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] replied in anger,'' you call Yazeed ( Bad Character Person ) as Amir Ul Mominein?. Than Hazrat Ummar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] gave order of 20 lashes to the person who called Yazeed Amir Ul Mominein [ Tahdheeb Al'Tahdheeb Vol 1 Page 361]
15. The Proof of Sending Curses(Lanat) on Yazid!

Translation:The Proof of sending Lanah upon Yazid is derived from this (ayah), as was mentioned by Al-Barzanji (rah) in his Al-Ashaat and Imam Haythami (rah) in As-Sawaiq from Imam Ahmed (rah) that his son Abdullah asked him about sending Lanah on Yazid, and how sending Lanah upon him is mentioned in the book of Allah (i.e. Quran). Imam Ahmed (rah) in proof of (sending Lanah upon Yazid) mentioned these verses:Would ye then, if ye were given the command, work corruption in the land and sever your ties of kinship? Such are the men whom Allah has cursed…(47:22-23), So could there be a greater fitnah than the actions committed by Yazid? [Ruh ul Ma’ani by Imam Al-Alusi, Volume 9 Under Surah Muhammad 22-23]